Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Holcombe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:46, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Holcombe[edit]

Bio about a non-notable figure in history with no reliable sources cited for verifiability Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nom. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:49, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:49, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as geneology project without evidence of notability or reliable sources. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, StarM 23:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This "biography" is a genealogical research entry based on land records, a self-published source, and substantial guesswork with interest coming from the extended Holcombe family. He had multiple notable descendants but shows no notability in his own right. • Gene93k (talk) 04:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.